This piece is featured in The D.C. Brief, TIME’s political newsletter. Subscribe to receive similar content directly in your inbox.
Zohran Mamdani found himself exactly where Republicans wished him to be on Wednesday—engaged in an interview with Fox News, a channel favored by MAGA supporters. Their hope was that the individual poised to become New York City’s next Mayor might provide sound bites for national use against Democrats. This appearance was even anticipated to influence the agenda for the upcoming first general-election debate, scheduled for the following evening.
However, Mamdani responded cautiously concerning Middle Eastern peace and, when presented with the chance, refrained from making trivial attacks on President Donald Trump and his family. Furthermore, his defense of proposals to offer free city bus services, boost funding for childcare assistance, and raise taxes on New York’s wealthiest 1% was delivered in a measured manner, far from any radical rhetoric.
This incident signaled that the Republican objective of portraying Mamdani as a figure capable of damaging the Democratic party in next year’s midterm elections might prove more challenging than anticipated. Although Democrats nationwide are preparing for Mamdani to feature in opponents’ negative campaigns and fundraising efforts, it remains uncertain how much impact this will have outside New York City. Discussions with figures from both parties indicate that Republicans’ attempts to associate Mamdani’s political views with Democratic candidates have yielded mixed results thus far.
If current polls are accurate, New Yorkers are less than three weeks away from electing the city’s first Muslim Mayor—a candidate who secured the Democratic nomination, much to the displeasure of many within his own party and the initial satisfaction of Republicans.
Just this week, a Republican candidate for New York Attorney General issued a fundraising email labeling Mamdani the “kiss of death for Democrats,” while Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik, aiming to unseat New York Gov. Kathy Hochul next year, referred to Mamdani in a press release as “Kathy Hochul’s Endorsed Jihadist.”
Nevertheless, some Republicans privately acknowledge that it is difficult to present Mamdani as the mastermind behind the Democrats’ national strategy. The astute 33-year-old state legislator may command significant media attention, but New York Mayors are not typically viewed as decisive influencers within the Democratic Party. “How did Bill DeBlasio and [Mike] Bloomberg fare in 2020?” questioned a former senior staff member of the Republican National Committee, referencing two recent New York Mayors who sought the nomination but gained minimal traction.
Another complication is that even New Yorkers are unfamiliar with Mamdani, let alone most voters beyond the city’s boroughs. A Quinnipiac poll released last week showed that 19% of likely New York City voters lacked sufficient information to form an opinion of him. Nationally, his recognition is even lower. “I’m not a Mamdani supporter, but he’s not the source of our problems,” a Democratic strategist confided.
Many consultants recall how the Democrats’ significant losses in 2010 stemmed from Republicans vilifying Nancy Pelosi, then the House Speaker. A banner proclaiming “Fire Pelosi” hung at the Republican National Committee headquarters near the Capitol. Republicans personalized the election, and it proved effective.
Trump, known for using derogatory nicknames for opponents, has called Mamdani, a self-identified democratic socialist (not a communist), “Communist mayor” and the “”. Republican strategists connected to the Trump White House’s political operations correctly observe that Trump—more than nearly anyone in politics—understands that repeated insults become accepted truths for his supporters. Consider the impact of Trump’s consistent labeling on “Crooked Hillary” and “Sleepy Joe.” However, when applied to “Crying Chuck” (his term for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer), the effect is less damaging.
Neither Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer nor House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries have chosen to endorse their fellow New Yorker. The Democratic National Committee congratulated Mamdani on his victory but is scarcely allocating resources to a contest that has frustrated numerous consultants still attempting to ascertain the party’s platform for the upcoming cycle. Even the Democratic Mayors Association has not yet lent its support to a seemingly inevitable future member.
Mamdani clearly comprehends the current political landscape, including the opportunities and risks facing his party. Addressing 3,000 supporters in Washington Heights on Monday, he appeared poised to challenge the very Democratic Establishment that regards him with apprehension. “Our movement is one where we precisely understand who and what we are advocating for,” Mamdani proclaimed, initiating a final push towards the ballot. “We are not intimidated by our own principles. For too long, we have tried merely not to lose. Now, it is time for us to win.”
Two days later, in the Fox News studio, Mamdani presented himself as a potential collaborator for anyone, including President Donald Trump, who has threatened to withhold federal funds from New York should he prevail. “I will … serve as a Mayor prepared to engage in discussions at any time to reduce the cost of living. That is how I intend to lead this city. That is the partnership I aim to cultivate, not only with Washington, D.C., but with anyone across this nation.”
This provides a strong counter-argument to those who would label Mamdani and his allies as neo-Marxists; the outcome of such a judgment remains uncertain. In an era where fame often replaces substance and unconventional behavior drives fundraising, the high-profile mayoral race in America’s largest city could potentially re-center struggling Democrats and offer them a sense of direction. Mamdani might simultaneously become a prominent voice and a vulnerability for Democrats. Indeed, both possibilities can coexist. Thus, as Mamdani prepares for a debate Thursday night against his opponents, many nationwide will be observing two key aspects: whether he lives up to the expectations Republicans are keen to project onto him, and whether he can offer a clear path for Democrats struggling to connect with voters. What is certain, however, is that Mamdani has successfully adapted to a spotlight that would have overwhelmed other candidates.
Understand the key developments in Washington. .
